An energy technology's water use, sometimes referred to as its water footprint, is the amount of water that is used in order to produce a unit of energy. The water used as fuel for generating hydroelectricity is returned to the water course and remains available for other purposes.
A common and accepted framework for reporting on hydropower’s net water footprint has not yet been established due to inconsistencies in the currently available methodologies for calculating net consumptive water losses, and a lack of clear guidelines on the allocation of these losses in the case of multipurpose reservoirs.
The issue of consumptive use of water, on the other hand, examines how much water is consumed and is, therefore, no longer available. For hydropower, evaporative losses are increasingly considered to be consumptive losses.
However, most watercourses already lost water through evaporation prior to the introduction of a reservoir. Therefore, a net approach is the only way to accurately assess the evaporative losses of a reservoir.
A net evaporation evaluation takes into account the pre-existing characteristics of the site by factoring out the natural evapotranspiration of plants in the flooded area and the evaporation of pre-existing water bodies, both of which occur naturally in any landscape.
Furthermore, reservoirs typically make water available to the system that was previously not available when needed. Wet and dry seasons lead to an uneven hydrograph, with too much water for part of the year and not enough in other parts of the year.
Through the strategic use of a reservoir, hydropower facilities are able to smooth the annual variations in runoff, conserving excess water in the reservoir during high-flow periods for use furing times when natural inflows are insufficient.
This implies a credit may be needed in any true assessment of hydropower's water footprint, recognising the value of making water available when it is most needed.
Our work on water footprint
We are working to examine the issue of quantifying net consumptive water evaporative losses associated with hydropower projects, considering the conditions prior to and after project implementation.
We are also working to establish guidelines on how to apportion these water losses among the multiple services provided by hydropower development, taking into account the seasonality of water value.
Join the network
IHA members can access the knowledge network in Hydropower Pro, our online member community.
In the online group, network members can connect with each other, exchange experiences and access essential resources, briefings and case studies.
For any questions, please contact IHA senior analyst Bill Girling at firstname.lastname@example.org
Latest associated content
33 GW of new hydropower capacity was commissioned in 2015, including 2.5 GW of pumped storage, according to estimates in our new briefing, 2016 Key Trends in HydroType:Blog postDate:1 March 2016
In December 2015, the International Hydropower Association (IHA) carried out an annual issues survey for the first time. This new, annual initiative aims to take the pulse of the hydropower sector at large, monitor key issues faType:Blog postDate:1 March 2016
In December 2015, the International Hydropower Association (IHA) conducted a new annual survey. More than 200 people involved in hydropower gave their views on a range of issues for the sector.Type:Blog postDate:12 February 2016
At the end of 2015 we can look back on a significant year for hydropower, from the gathering of the sector at the World Hydropower Congress in Beijing, to the crucial Paris Agreement at COP21. Here are just some of the highlightType:Blog postDate:15 December 2015
For the first time, we are taking the pulse of the hydropower sector at large in a new annual survey. You are invited to take part.Type:Blog postDate:30 November 2015